Back in the good old days when American movie criticism was dominated by a few dozen intelligent people who could write and who were knowledgeable and really cared a lot about movies, plus Richard Schickel
– and even he could sometimes make sense so long as the movie he was weighing on in didn’t have a man with a gun riding a horsie in it
– the National Society of Film Critics used to publish these lively anthologies, bringing together previously published reviews and profiles and think pieces written by its members, organized around a theme. (One of them, the 1990
Produced and Abandoned, edited by Michael Sragow and devoted to celebrating worthy obscurities
– “the best films you’ve never seen”
– featured a cover illustration of a dusty-looking guy who looked as if he’d stepped out an Edward Hopper painting, leaning against an unoccupied ticket-taker’s booth, with a blissful smile suggesting that the promise of seeing something amazing made all the hungry suffering he had to bear seem worth it. That’s as good a way to describe what it felt like to be a hopeful movie freak in 1990.) In 1981, the Society put out a collection called
The Movie Star, and that book was my introduction to Peter Rainer, whose essay “Acting in the Seventies” did a terrific job with a great subject. Rainer appreciated the value of “classic” movie-star acting, as demonstrated by a master like James Cagney or Cary Grant
– “I like Cary Grant in
None but the Lonely Heart, his ‘best’ performance, but I love him in
North by Northwest.”
– but he also grasped what had changed after Brando and the rise of the Method and then the counterculture, which led to a new generation of actors who thought of movie acting as a vehicle for true creative expression, and who
– in the cases of actors such as Jeff Bridges, Gary Busey, and the young Robert De Niro
– don’t “keep a respectful distance” from the characters they play.
And Rainer also recognized the importance of a parallel track of new hip comics
– Richard Pryor, Lily Tomlin, Robin Williams, the
Saturday Night Live crew
– who established themselves in nightclubs and concert stages and on record albums and on TV, and who were beginning to cross over into movies, often in dramatic parts: “They don’t even crack up in the middle of one of their own skits to show they’re only fooling. They’re too
obsessed to crack up. They represent craziness without sentimentality. Their comic personalities are woven around the put-on, and improvisation becomes a way of scrounging up idiosyncrasies that will, hopefully, connect with the audience. Young people who don’t identify with these comics still connect with the craziness.”