![]() |
| Ted Danson and Kristen Bell |
Setting a television comedy in the
afterlife seems like an excellent way to set yourself up for failure.
Since there is, by its very nature, a distinct sense of finality
about the place, it’s hard to see how you might tell a long-running
story that’s set there. Furthermore, since most religious
traditions view existence after death as primarily a matter of
receiving one’s just reward or punishment for their actions on the
mortal plane, it’s not clear how you might develop a sense of
character, or achieve any sort of narrative progression or tension.
However, that’s just what Michael Schur and the creative team of
NBC’s The Good Place achieved on the first season of the
show.
As Mark Clamen noted in his
initial review of The Good Place’s premiere, Schur’s
metaphysical comedy had a rather tentative beginning. I found myself
watching the first few episodes primarily out of curiosity as to how
– or if – the show’s premise would develop, as well as for the
performances by Ted Danson and Kristen Bell. However, as the larger
scheme behind Schur’s premise began to reveal itself, and as the
characters who inhabit this decidedly off-kilter version of heaven
became more fully realized, The Good Place became far more
than a pleasant-enough entertainment with a veneer of philosophical
sophistication.


